Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Nachum
It's a classic Ponzi scheme.

So long as there are more "new investors" "paying in" than people collecting dividends or cashing out, it works.

The only deviation from Ponzi's plan is that if you die, you lose everything and your estate doesn't inherit your position. When created, the age when you started collecting was a year after the average life expectency. So on average, people paid taxes and didn't live to collect.

That and forcing everyone to "invest" are the only thing that have kept Social Security afloat as long as it has been.

4 posted on 09/11/2011 3:28:29 PM PDT by cc2k ( If having an "R" makes you conservative, does walking into a barn make you a horse's (_*_)?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: cc2k
So long as there are more "new investors" "paying in" than people collecting dividends or cashing out, it works.

It would seem to me if they increase the payroll tax cut for 2012 that it would cause accounting problems sooner rather than later. One way or another, the shortfall will have to be made up. It will either be a decrease in payouts or increased payroll taxes in the future. That means increasing the cap by a substantial amount or lifting it all together. Reducing benefits wouldn't seem likely.

8 posted on 09/11/2011 3:42:37 PM PDT by EVO X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson