Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
Thank you that was a very good explanation. Bush's plan did nothing illegal as I can see, but obamma's plan is illegal to the hilt, that is obvious!

I would think any plan of this magnitude had to be okayed at the very top of government, with the president himself having to sign off on this, as this was very very dangerous and stupid, since we were operating undercover in a foreign country? Wow!

25 posted on 09/10/2011 5:21:49 PM PDT by rawhide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: rawhide
very very dangerous and stupid

That does make it sound like a signature President Obama plan.

26 posted on 09/10/2011 5:30:59 PM PDT by marktwain (In an age of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

To: rawhide
I would think any plan of this magnitude had to be okayed at the very top of government,

to coordinate several alphabet agencies under DOJ [fbo,atf etc] with portions of homeland security, possibly NSA and *legally* a MUST to involve State Dept, it HAD to be run from a very few chiefs' desks...

fish rots from the head and all that...

wouldnt suprise me if the directive came straight from the antique desk with all the heel marks on it witht the title 'operation iron river'...

goto david codreas' gun rights examiner page and check the collection of links he and mike v have put together...

lots of necks should be gettin stretched, but prolly wont...which will signal further corruption ...

40 posted on 09/13/2011 6:37:08 AM PDT by Gilbo_3 (Gov is not reason; not eloquent; its force.Like fire,a dangerous servant & master. George Washington)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson