Posted on 09/10/2011 5:03:22 AM PDT by jimbo123
A dramatic surveillance video captured a late-night shooting in Brooklyn that left a 23-year-old woman dead.
The shooter, wearing a Yankee cap and casually walking toward a group of people, appears to briefly engage them. Then with steely calm, he squeezed off several shots just before 11 p.m. Thursday.
The footage outside the Bed-Stuy Supermarket shows two women, three men and a teen walking down Weirfield St. in Bushwick. The women disappear from the frame, as the shooter walks up behind the group.
(Excerpt) Read more at nydailynews.com ...
It appears the shooter is black. Were the victims black as well?
Tyrone out for a walk with his gun.
All of a sudden his gun had a mind of it’s own, jumped into his hand and started shooting. Tyrone is innocent the gun is guilty.
From the body language, it appears there were some words prior to the shooting. He probably tried to hit on one of the girls and was rebuffed.
Why were the guys wearing their pants below their butts. Was that what got the guy with the gun mad?
This will make
www.thethugreport.com
I was trying to look on Google to see if this was some sort of insult and there are lots of guys that have their underwear showing like this. The boys in the video had their pants the same way.
You would think if the guy with the gun did not like looking at their underwear he would have shot them in the butt.
I will never understand the point of wearing pants like that.
I work in what is commonly known as a ‘bad neighborhood’ and every morning when I walk home (the only white guy in the area, btw) I think, “I can’t believe that look is still popular.” I think (not being sarcastic) it’s intended as some kind of Lazy Guy’s flip-off to the world—”You can’t make me dress like an adult!”
It appears the shooter is black. Were the victims black as well?
Bed-Stuy Supermarket isnt a place for white’s I am sure the victims were black. That much more air and water for the rest.
In Bedford Stuyvesant, everyone is “diverse.”
Apparently it derives from when prisoners are issued uniforms there is one size.
The smaller men end up with droopy drawers.
Some kind of status symbol now. Go figure.
Reminds me of my kid with a load in his diaper. :)
Whenever I see images like this I think to myself, “Oh, well, this guy is just preparing himself for life in prison.”
Do people who do this really think this looks, I don’t know, cool?
Stupid is the new cool, I guess.
That’s been a crappy neighborhood for many decades.
It’s
and remember, all thugs are innocent until convicted in a court of law.
The butt hanging out started in prison and made its way to the streets as thug fashion, just like the tatoos of barbed-wire, or whatever, going completely around the bicep. Originally, they had to do with the idea of being, how shall I say this delicately, owned by someones and available only to certain someones. Ironic isn’t it?
Yes. The pants in partial pull-down mode, to my thinking, speaks of the dehumanizing acts of sodomy that go on in prison, far more than it does the “I’ve been to prison...see, I ain’t got no belt...” statement that young thugs think they are making.
I’m always reminded of the line from the movie Cape Fear delivered by Robert Deniro (Max Cady in the film):
“There ain’t nothin’ else to do in prison except desecrate your flesh.”
“I will never understand the point of wearing pants like that.”
They just want to show off this weeks underwear. Friday is
new under wear day, where they swap underwear with someone
else. That is how they find someone to swap with.
LOL
It's easier than making a sign to wear that says, "I maintain a subhuman culture."
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.