Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: La Enchiladita
"""Oh no, that’s like saying they are INVITING attack by wearing the uniform."""

I would much rather have a LIVE Soldier in civilian clothes, then a Dead one in uniform.

They did the ban in the 80's to protect our Soldiers, and a good thing they did, you, I nor anyone else were harmed by that order to ban.

In civies or uniform, our soldiers still know how to protect themselves, if given a chance. In uniform they were sitting ducks, what chance did they have to protect themselves, armed or unarmed?

I say cut the RISKS. It's like saying after a child has been run over, "My kid has a right to play in the street, it's our street", your kid is also DEAD.

18 posted on 09/08/2011 12:54:01 PM PDT by annieokie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: annieokie
It's like saying after a child has been run over, "My kid has a right to play in the street, it's our street", your kid is also DEAD

I'm sorry, that is not a good analogy. It doesn't pass the common sense test. No one advocates that kids have a "right" to play in the street. Please.

19 posted on 09/08/2011 1:02:24 PM PDT by La Enchiladita (Jihad THIS!! America Forever!!! Let's Roll!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson