Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

L.A. Times: The real Ronald Reagan may not meet today's GOP standards
Los Angeles Times ^ | 09/07/2011 | Mark Z. Barabak

Posted on 09/07/2011 7:13:54 PM PDT by SeekAndFind

When the Republican presidential hopefuls gather to debate Wednesday night in Simi Valley, one thing seems certain: Lavish tribute will be paid to Ronald Reagan.

That is fitting: The event is being held at Reagan's presidential library and burial ground, high on a bluff overlooking the Santa Susana Mountains.

It's also smart politics. Reagan has become a sainted figure within the GOP who, not incidentally, is the most successful and popular of the party's modern presidents.

But the Reagan reverie will doubtless overlook much of the Reagan reality.

As president, the conservative icon approved several tax increases to deal with a soaring budget deficit, repeatedly boosted the nation's debt limit, signed into law a bill granting amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants and, despite his anti-Washington rhetoric, oversaw an increase in the size and spending of the federal government. Before that, as California governor, he enacted what at the time was the largest state tax increase in American history. He also signed into law one of the nation's most permissive abortion bills; any Republican who tried that today would be cast out of the party.

The fact that Reagan often took the actions grudgingly speaks to what, by modern Republican standards, may be one of the greatest heresies of all: At bottom, Reagan was a pragmatist, willing, when necessary, to cut a deal and compromise.

"He had a strong set of core values and operated off of those," said Stuart Spencer, a GOP strategist who stood by Reagan's side for virtually his entire political career, starting with his first run for governor. "But when push came to shove, he did various things he didn't like doing, because he knew it was in the best interests of the state or country at the time."

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: california; centrist; conservative; lamestreammedia; latimes; mediabias; mediaspin; reagan; ronaldreagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

1 posted on 09/07/2011 7:13:59 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The latimes meets my standards at the bottom of my bird cage [I do not buy it my neighbor donates it ]


2 posted on 09/07/2011 7:17:45 PM PDT by barbarianbabs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What a bunch of bull. So they are saying we would have gone with Bush?


3 posted on 09/07/2011 7:18:55 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barbarianbabs

John F. Kennedy would not meet today’s Democrat Party standards.


4 posted on 09/07/2011 7:19:48 PM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: barbarianbabs
LA Times backed Richard Nixon in every race he ran
5 posted on 09/07/2011 7:20:12 PM PDT by scooby321
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: barbarianbabs
signed into law a bill granting amnesty to millions of illegal immigrants

No way.

6 posted on 09/07/2011 7:20:21 PM PDT by deadrock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Anytime the LA Times lectures on what Ronald Reagan was all about, you can tune out.

It is similar to listening to liberals about the 2nd Amendment.


7 posted on 09/07/2011 7:20:32 PM PDT by rlmorel ("When marching down the same road, one doesn't need 'marching orders' to reach the same destination")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

John Kennedy wouldn’t be acceptable to democrats.


8 posted on 09/07/2011 7:22:16 PM PDT by abigailsmybaby ("To understan' the livin', you gotta commune wit' da dead." Minerva)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

And George McGovern couldn’t meet the standards of today’s Democratic Party.


9 posted on 09/07/2011 7:23:01 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321

The LA Times wasa a far different newspaper in the 1950s and 1960s as was its parent, the Chicago Tribune.


10 posted on 09/07/2011 7:24:52 PM PDT by bwc2221
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The MSM have their talking point for the debate, Reagan.
The first attacks after the debate on MSNBC was bashing Reagan.

11 posted on 09/07/2011 7:27:11 PM PDT by MaxMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

left hit piece.


12 posted on 09/07/2011 7:27:24 PM PDT by ken21 (ruling class dem + rino progressives -- destroying america for 150 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant
John F. Kennedy would not meet today’s Democrat Party standards.

In today's Lamestream GOP controlled soley by Rockefellwer establishment Liberals JFK would be called a Right Wing Extremist. Additionally he would be labeled so by the Lamestream media who would also declare him unelectable. All the good party loyal sheep would bleat in agreement.

13 posted on 09/07/2011 7:29:28 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

“He also signed into law one of the nation’s most permissive abortion bills; any Republican who tried that today would be cast out of the party.”

Reagan also later regretted that decision and became staunchly pro-life.

http://www.amazon.com/Abortion-Conscience-Nation-Ronald-Reagan/dp/0840741162

Call it an “inconvenient truth” to the author of this article.


14 posted on 09/07/2011 7:33:32 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bwc2221

No they would never vote for a bomber pilot.


15 posted on 09/07/2011 7:34:40 PM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

“No they would never vote for a bomber pilot.”

In addition, I believe McGovern opposed the so called “Employee Free Choice Act” which would’ve eliminated the right to a secret ballot by employees on whether they wished to unionize or not. That alone puts him on Jimmy Hoffa Jr.’s hit list.


16 posted on 09/07/2011 7:37:18 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The better headline is: A real and unbiased newspaper doesn’t meet anyone’s standard in the mainstream press anymore.


17 posted on 09/07/2011 7:39:45 PM PDT by demkicker (My passion for freedom is stronger than that of Democrats whose obsession is to enslave me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Al Sharpton just said the exact same thing on nbc. Amazing how the hive mind of the MSM works.


18 posted on 09/07/2011 7:42:37 PM PDT by grandpa jones (Obama must be exhausted, having to tote that giant brain of his around all the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Isnt it great that the LA times is looking out for the core values of the Conservative wing of the republican party... Gee that is sooo like them. They care deeply for love and fairness of all political parties... /s


19 posted on 09/07/2011 7:46:13 PM PDT by Walkingfeather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I’m old enough to remember a time when there was a meaningful difference between the Democratic Party and the Communist Party, and when you could find at least twenty percent of Democrat politicians were not America haters.

That time is long gone.


20 posted on 09/07/2011 7:47:03 PM PDT by Zeppo ("Happy Pony is on - and I'm NOT missing Happy Pony")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-49 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson