Posted on 09/07/2011 5:58:29 PM PDT by AfricanChristian
Not very different from the scenario I promoted about 4 or 5 months after 9-11 on FR, and which earned me the kudo “I would vote for you if you ran for President!” from at least one FReeper.
My scenario involved specifically going after infrastructure first, like Saudi oil fields, just to give
them a taste of how serious we were.Unfortunately we weren’t that serious, preferring to win an unwinnable century-long battle for the usual elusive “hearts and minds”.
Men far away resolved to hurt us. They reached out very far, and then did that.
Receiving the blow, we then reached out very far, and set up camp in their home, shooting them, bombing them from above, and taking over their government.
We tromp around there and make daily life —not just planning bombings in the USA —very hard for them.
It’s not just revenge or hate, but instead putting the violent battle into their home, and away from our homes.
The only thing we could do better is stop all this stupid, “human landscape” crypto-sociology mumbo-jumbo and building schools for girls.
No US taxes for Afghani girl schools (though I like girls). Also no USMC protection for poppy fields.
Let’s just speak the language Afghanis understand —shooting folks and breaking stuff —that’s mission enough. They understand that completely.
Not a big surprise, new travels slow in the 7th century.
Then why is the US and NATO giving Al-Qaeda terrorists money, arms, training, supplies, intelligence, and air cover to attack the Libyans?
Why did the US and NATO support the Al-Qaeda backed KLA in their attacks on the Serbs?
Shouldn't Zbigniew Brzezinski be held responsible for arming and training Osama Bin Laden?
Many Afghans wipe their backside with their hand after defecating on the ground. What’s your point?
Nice straw man you got there. Lemme guess... You get your talking points from The Nation?
I forgot, if they hide out in Pakistan, kill them there. I’m not bloodthirsty, but death seems to be the only thing that stops these pricks.
First of all, we should have no qualms about destroying any monument or "holy site" or strategic target in enemy territory. I would have no problem nuking every holy site in islam, if it would have the desired effect.
I'm not saying it wouldn't work, just wondering how effective it would be.
Read the koran and you will know... if mecca disappears... islam dies.
LLS
When you have a strategic target, the elimination of which can devastate your society, it's not good to piss off nations with nuclear weapons.
Its one of their primary goals. Im just here to help them out .
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.