Was it projecting when I pointed out they couldn't even name the right clause in the Constitution?? You're going have to do better than that. This court contradicted itself in its decision and made other errors. Further, there's NOTHING in the decision that declares Obama to be a natural born citizen. Nothing.
edge919 wrote: “This court contradicted itself in its decision and made other errors.
The state Supreme Court upheld the decision, unanimously. Did some court find it incorrect or are you just playing make-believe judge?
edge919: “Further, there’s NOTHING in the decision that declares Obama to be a natural born citizen. Nothing.”
Obama? This thread is about Rubio, remember? What the Court wrote is directly relevant here, because it refutes a crank legal theory that some here are saying disqualifies Rubio. Here’s how the theory did before real judges:
“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are ‘natural born Citizens’ for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.” [Ankeny v. Daniels, Court of Appeals of Indiana, November 12, 2009]