To: Menehune56
What has been interesting to me throughout the entire "birther" debate is that the anti-birthers fail to comprehend what Obama himself stated on his fightthesmears website:
He countered the inelibility claims by stating plainly that his father was not a U.S. citizen and that he (Obama) was "native born".
I'm confident that as a graduate of Harvard Law School who went on to teach Constitutional Law, Obama knows very well that there is a difference between "native born" and "natural born". Therefore, I can only conclude that Obama knows that he doesn't meet the Constitutional requirements to serve as POTUS. And you can bet that he's secretly laughing at those who defend his eligibility.
To: SuzyQueIN
Obama himself stakes his status as “native born” (claimed to be equivalent to “natural born”)on his being born in Hawaii.
The fact that he had to forge both the Certification of Live Birth and the Certificate of Live Birth indicates that he was NOT born in Hawaii.
Since we already know that his mother was legally incapable of transmitting citizenship to him, add all these facts together and you get: Obama is not ANY kind of U.S. citizen whatsoever. Foreign father + mother incapable of transmitting citizenship + not born on U.S. soil = not a U.S. citizen.
197 posted on
09/08/2011 6:13:40 PM PDT by
Arthur McGowan
(In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson