Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Menehune56
What has been interesting to me throughout the entire "birther" debate is that the anti-birthers fail to comprehend what Obama himself stated on his fightthesmears website:

He countered the inelibility claims by stating plainly that his father was not a U.S. citizen and that he (Obama) was "native born".

I'm confident that as a graduate of Harvard Law School who went on to teach Constitutional Law, Obama knows very well that there is a difference between "native born" and "natural born". Therefore, I can only conclude that Obama knows that he doesn't meet the Constitutional requirements to serve as POTUS. And you can bet that he's secretly laughing at those who defend his eligibility.
147 posted on 09/08/2011 8:30:00 AM PDT by SuzyQueIN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]


To: SuzyQueIN

Obama himself stakes his status as “native born” (claimed to be equivalent to “natural born”)on his being born in Hawaii.

The fact that he had to forge both the Certification of Live Birth and the Certificate of Live Birth indicates that he was NOT born in Hawaii.

Since we already know that his mother was legally incapable of transmitting citizenship to him, add all these facts together and you get: Obama is not ANY kind of U.S. citizen whatsoever. Foreign father + mother incapable of transmitting citizenship + not born on U.S. soil = not a U.S. citizen.


197 posted on 09/08/2011 6:13:40 PM PDT by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson