Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sometime lurker
The link is the real case not the cliff note liberal spin version, you will see the court said his parents were legal residents at the time of kims birth.http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=us&vol=169&invol=649
103 posted on 09/07/2011 7:25:02 PM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: org.whodat
Look at your link, about 2/3 of the way down, under VII.
whether a child born in the United States, of parents of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the emperor of China, but have a permanent domicile and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative.

107 posted on 09/07/2011 7:58:17 PM PDT by sometime lurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson