...with a nice picture of Ann, from opinion.latimes.com:
2007 Ann Coulter photo by Mark Sullivan/WireImage.com
Posted on 09/07/2011 1:42:59 PM PDT by RonDog
...with a nice picture of Ann, from opinion.latimes.com:
2007 Ann Coulter photo by Mark Sullivan/WireImage.com
I haven’t really paid attention to the Amanda Knox thing, but from the few things I have seen/read...i think she is innocent.
"From Tawana Brawley, Mumia and the Central Park rapists, to the Duke lacrosse players and Karl Rove, liberals are always on the wrong side of a criminal case.You can read the REST of Ann's column this week here:A few times could be a coincidence; every time is evidence of a psychological disorder." - Ann Coulter
www.anncoulter.com
Has Ann formally endorsed Mitt Romney yet?
I’m not so sure she’s guilty either.
The prosecution seems to be relying on the fact that her DNA was found all over the place she lived.
'An ill wind is blowing': Now even PROSECUTOR says Foxy Knoxy will be freed (Amanda Knox)
Mmmm...I don’t know...the innocent don’t lie. As a juror I convicted on the lies alone which I consider pretty good circumstantial evidence.
Which is simpler?
A lowlife loser that women avoided like the plague committing a rape and murder all by himself?
Or a young couple of a totally different class conspiring with lowlife loser that women avoided like the plague to commit a rape and murder?
Amanda Knox was undoubtedly a slut.
Some people think that means she is therefore guilty of anything she is accused of.
I believe she’s innocent, too and a victim of a crazy prosecutor. The guy who did it was convicted of it and is currently locked up. How many murderers can there be?
Stuck her foot in her mouth about teachers being useless, meaning their union, I guess.
Gretchen had to correct her and repeated two times, "Teachers aren't useless".
From seeing her this morning, it seems we now have an "enhanced" Ann.
As a reminder to all, in Italy you are presumed guilty and must prove your innocence - not like here in the good ‘ol U. S. of A. A point I stressed to my son as he went off for an Italian school trip earlier this year!
Professional shark jumper Ann Coulter.
Another NYC Lawyer,
“I don’t know...the innocent don’t lie”
Everyone lies.
“As a juror I convicted on the lies alone which I consider pretty good circumstantial evidence.”
No, it isn’t circumstantial evidence of murder. It isn’t evidence of anything at all but that they’re liars.
Knox later said she falsely accused Lumumba only because the police wanted her to do so.
Another Casey Anthony?
It all depends on what they lie about.
“It all depends on what they lie about”
No it doesn’t. Not even if you lie about your alibi, because not having an alibi is not evidence of murder. At it means is that you can’t prove you didn’t commit the murder.
People seem very confused as to what constitutes evidence, let alone circumstantial evidence. Lying can, indeed, tend to indicate guilty. But it is not evidence of guilt. It goes to credibility, and if a defendant is not credible you cannot trust their defense. But that doesn’t indicate guilt. It indicates incredibility. If you want to pretend incredibility as “circumstantial evidence” you’re a hop, skip, and jump away from convicting people because you don’tlike their face.
NYT: DUKE LACROSSE PLAYERS KILLED MEREDITH KERCHER (6/17/09)
tend to indicate guilty = tend to indicate guilt, don’tlike = don’t like.
Thanks for linking to that.
Ann has gone off the deep end. I think she is jealous of other women. Seriously.
She repeatedly lied to the police and must know more about what happened than she is telling. Although, IIRC, she was so drunk/high she may not remember much.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
