Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

Laura Ingrahm and Ann Coulter; two pundits that are beyond their shelf life.

Sadly, both, though in the conservative camp, consider themselves among the elite, and therefore must dictate to us peons who is electable (read: acceptable to the establishment).

They really don’t support, or belong, to the TEA party movement, otherwise you would have heard them vocally supporting COD and Joe Miller in “10. Instead LI and AC would throw cold water on those TEA party candidates, using the “unelectable” line.

As far as I’m concerned, I think LI and AC are both a bit of the female psycho type.


16 posted on 09/06/2011 7:38:07 PM PDT by PhiloBedo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PhiloBedo

They’ve filled in for O’Reilly a tad too much.... starting to think like him.


85 posted on 09/06/2011 8:17:34 PM PDT by antceecee (Bless us Father.. have mercy on us and protect us from evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: PhiloBedo

While I agreed that Harriet Myers was not the best choice for a Supreme Court judgeship, I was amazed that both Coulter and Ingraham kept harping on the fact that Myers wasn’t an Ivy League [or quasi-Ivy League] Law School grad as a major reason not to nominate her. Ivy League pukes are what got us into this mess. The elitism from these two so-called Conservatives was amazing.


166 posted on 09/06/2011 9:17:43 PM PDT by PzLdr ("The Emperor is not as forgiving as I am" - Darth Vader)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson