A good example is the two photos in a previous post. The author ignores the simple fact that a LOT of walking around was happening in the area in the foreground in the 24 hours between the photos.
They seem to think the guys went outside to snap a photo, ran back in where it was warm and then, 24 hours later, ran back out to snap a quick color photo.
Jeez.
The problem with all these conspiracy debunker folks is that they offer either no evidence or a laughable and complete missreading of existing evidence to make their point.
A good example is the two photos in a previous post. Your debunking ignores the simple fact that nowhere NEAR the amount of walking around necessary to cover up those rover tracks happened in the area in the foreground in the 24 hours between the photos.
In fact, there actually not all that many bootprints where the rover tracks were - it's mostly untouched soil. So how much walking around does it take to obliterate rover tracks with untouched soil?
You seem to think you can claim the guys went outside to snap a photo, never went back in to get warm and then, after walking around for 24 more hours, ran back out to snap a quick color photo that covered up rover tracks with no boot prints.
Jeez.
The Moon landings were, up to that time, the most thoroughly documented events in human history. Probably still are.
You can try to deny all of it you want, but you have a little problem when it comes to physical evidence: about 800 pounds of rocks.
Then there is this: I read an estimate that about 400K people worked directly on Apollo. Thousands would have been in the know if it was faked. Find one today who says it was.
By your estimation, the Apollo program qualifies as the most intricate and vast conspiracy in history, and yet everyone kept their mouths shut.
Wow.
Having a father who worked for NASA in a high profile position since Apollo, and having worked for NASA for a bit right out of college, this is just too funny.
—Your debunking ignores the simple fact that nowhere NEAR the amount of walking around necessary to cover up those rover tracks happened in the area in the foreground in the 24 hours between the photos.—
I apologize. I thought you were being sarcastic. I was just having fun with someone I thought was doing what I was doing. I did not know you were serious.
I don’t argue this one, or the 9/11 thing with conspiracy theorists. I’ve seen those artifacts on the moon and touched them. It was a tourist stopover on my way to Earth. It is a fascinating relic from a very, VERY brief moment in your planet’s history.
And I’m not going to share with you how so many of us can visit there and leave no sign of our presence. You folks will figure it out on your own in about 15 years.