“These are growth segments of our population. They are not going to be software engineers.”
We have to be the only country (other from Europe and Britain) that has an underclass that outbreeds the high achieving. I have no idea what will have to be done wiht them since we are close to having small caches of safe places with safe people, while the rest of the underclass gorws and grows and grows.
If that “underclass” had to work to fill their tummies it would keep them a little busier doing productive things.
I've long been tempted to use that fact to confound Darwinists with high I.Q.s. In Darwinism, "survival of the fittest" is measured by differential reproduction rates. That's all: all else is opinion.
Given that, which subset of the population is currently fittest by Darwinian standards?
I never had the heart to use it on them, but it's a good acid test to separate the Darwinists from the Social Darwinists.