Yeah, that sure is damning! LoL
I guess there isn’t a republican that won’t be smeared in the attempt to tear down anybody who might be competition to the candidate you prefer.
You know, the first time you try to point out some conflict of interest, it is fascinating, and people check out your links, and research, and dig, and get opinions. They find out you were wrong, but they can see how you misunderstood, or how you couldn’t get all the facts, and it is forgotten.
The second time, the same research, only with the idea that you might be wrong again, and when that is confirmed, they begin to wonder why you can’t do your own research better.
After the third and fourth time, people get tired of having to spend hours researching things you flippantly declare, only to find time and time again that when all the facts are known, your charges are plain silly.
After that, we just start ignoring you, and praying for those you smear with your attacks, because we all don’t have all the time in the world to keep proving you wrong again and again and again.
So, given what I’ve learned from all your other attacks, I am going to just assume that if I research the names of the people involved here, I’ll find out that contrary to your assertions, they are good businessmen who employ hispanic americans, who would find it harder to employ people and make money if an arizona-style law was passed, and that their concern was the amount of additional regulatory burden it would put on them.
If you want to dispute that hypothesis, then why don’t you for a chance actually DO the research, take one of the names, and PROVE that they are actually employing illegals and using their connections to stop from getting caught. Then we can discuss your evidence, rather than us wasting our time with your innuendo.