I guess you had rather have 4 more years of Hell?
If I go to the polls on November 6, 2012, and my choices are Obama (D) and Romney (R), then 4 more years of socialist, progressive hell is automatic.
Coldwater Creek wrote:
I guess you had rather have 4 more years of Hell?
I won't absolutely commit at this point, but I seriously doubt I have a preference between Republican Progressive Socialist and Democrat Socialist. If that's the choice, I'll probably either leave the line blank (most likely) or stay home (less likely).
I'm not sure Perry can win either. I think that Obama would like to run against George Bush again, and the Dems and the media think that would work agains Perry. Republicans should not underestimate how unpopular George Bush is, even today, and I have my doubts that this country will elect a Texas Governor in 2012.
Any version of Palin/Cain or Cain/Palin would be my ideal ticket. Also, I believe that Romney = 4 more years of Obama, Perry = too close to call, and any other candidate = Republican president with Republican House and Senate.
The tough thing then will be not doubling the size of the Department of Education in 4 years, and increasing the budget of the Department of Energy and the Employment Prevention Agency by 50% in four years. That's what happened the last time we had a Republican controlled House and Senate with a Republican President.
Republicans aren't the answer. Especially not Ruling Class RINO Republicans. We need as many TEA Party conservatives as we can get, and we need them to be victorious in the Republican primaries, and possibly to take a shot at the Democrat primaries, too.