For every one of these articles that you post, you drive another voter AWAY from Palin. I think you are having the opposite effect that you want. The more Palin supporters act like cultists, and the more they attack other candidates rather than pointing out her strengths, the less support she is going to get. Is that what you want?
I have always considered myself a huge Palin fan, and truth be told, I still am.
The approach by her acolytes on here trying to slander those they see as a threat to her is leaving me with a very bad taste in my mouth though (especially since there is a huge likelihood she isn't even running).
There is a lot of wisdom in what you just posted. I hope those who have declared a jihad against our other candidates have sense enough to listen to what you are saying, but I am not optimistic about it.
Let me make this clear for you Perrybots. I have yet to support any candidate. BUT I DO OPPOSE THE RINO RICK PERRY.
I’ll say it in Texan so YA’ALLZ CAN UNDERSTAND IT. YA ALLZ have an unhealthy devotion to Rick Perry that anyone that opposes him must be assigned a candidate to attack.
YA ALLZ CAN GO AHEAD AND START HATIN ON SARAH PALIN. BUT IT WILL ONLY MAKE YOU LOOK STUPID.
Because if you do that I could just accuse you of supporting Obama, like you do to me. Opposing your candidate does not make me pro-Obama, it makes me anti-RINO. Do I make myself clear.
Honestly speaking, that's the real reason I've started to support Perry. I started to see all these threads about him... and how the conclusions made did not match the information provided in the articles.
So, I started to think that if these is this much hysterical lying going on about a candidate, I better look into him. And I found a candidate that has a pretty good record on the most important areas (economic growth, jobs, deregulation)... and a decent record on the rest.
Had there been no blatant lying about the guy, I'd still probably be supporting Cain right now.