Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar

No it is O’Reilly who is playing word games with her. I don’t know what there is about the word NO that you don’t understand, but it’s obvious that you see what you want to see here.

She’s against it, she’s said no to amnesty on many occasions.I believe her. Your agenda isn’t convincing me of anything. Sorry. Good day.


241 posted on 09/04/2011 9:22:34 AM PDT by curth (Sarah Palin 4 President 2012- Accept No Cheap Substitute)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]


To: curth
It depends on what the meaning of "is" is. I have asked you what your definition of amnesty is. Obama and McCain are against amnesty. They have said so. Politicians understand that the American people are against the A-word. So they just change the meaning of amnesty and support it under a different scheme or guise. Palin is no different than Obama and McCain in this regard.

I like and respect Sarah Palin. Hoever, her stance on amnesty is disturbing. So is Perry's and to a less degree, Romney's. In 2008 were were given an echo not a choice on immigration and amnesty. I am afraid that 2012 will be no different.

242 posted on 09/04/2011 9:30:58 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson