Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BuckeyeTexan; onyx; penelopesire; maggief; hoosiermama; SE Mom; Liz; rodguy911; Fred Nerks; ...

It’s messed up.

~~~~~

Jeeeze .. it’s freaking diabolical.

DAMN .. if this isn’t stinking like a setup for ‘12.. beyond infuriating and insidious. Blood is boiling!

The FEC doesn’t have to follow the Constitution?

Wondering if the Oversight Committee has any premise to venture in.


62 posted on 09/04/2011 9:02:09 PM PDT by STARWISE (The overlords are in place .. we are a nation under siege .. pray, go Galt & hunker down)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: STARWISE

I dread what will happen.

Watch every state and see who gets on the ballot to run for President.

The MSM has cajoled the public into believing that it would be “bigoted” to not vote for a foreign-born / not NBC candidate.


63 posted on 09/04/2011 9:24:13 PM PDT by thecodont
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

http://www.abdulhassanforpresident.com/second_circuit/reply_brief.pdf

...the Supreme Court upheld as constitutional, the internment of Japanese Americans because of their national origin. It took several decades, a congressional apology, millions in compensation and a few subsequent court decisions to try to fix this horrendous mistake. In this case, we once again face a significant discrimination issue of first impression in the form of invidious national origin discrimination against more than ten million American citizens. It cannot be that our judicial system is condemned to failure each time it faces significant issues of discrimination - it cannot be that we are condemned to deciding issues of discrimination incorrectly the first time we face them. It must be that we are capable of learning from the mistakes of the past and getting it right the first time. I kindly urge this Court to break from the tradition of Dredd Scott, Plessy and Hirabayashi by rejecting the invidious discrimination challenged in this case, grant Plaintiff the declaration he seeks, and declare the natural born provision to be trumped, mooted, abrogated and implicitly repealed by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments, together with the costs of this action and such other, further and different relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Dated: Queens Village, New York
March 22, 2011
Respectfully submitted,
_/s/ Abdul Hassan____________
Abdul Karim Hassan, Esq. (AH6510)
215-28 Hillside Avenue
Queens Village, New York 11427
Tel: 718-740-1000
Fax: 718-468-3894
Email: abdul@abdulhassan.com


64 posted on 09/04/2011 11:21:43 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

http://lawyers.justia.com/lawyer/abdul-karim-hassan-1273444


65 posted on 09/04/2011 11:39:46 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

We all knew this was coming the minute we realized that our government was going to do nothing about Obama’s eligibility issues. It’s simply stunning that more people on our side of the aisle didn’t see the slippery slope and precedent that Obama and his marxist friends were sending us down.

Just shaking my head. What to do? This has to be stopped.


69 posted on 09/05/2011 5:39:46 AM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks STARWISE.


70 posted on 09/05/2011 5:41:17 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

No formal function wants to assume responsibility for determining eligibility at this point. If they starting making rules now then they may very well be dragged into issues with Obama - and McCain - in 2008. And they do not want or need that.

Everyone will pass the buck until 2012 or 2016 and avoid responsibility. FEC, courts, congress....The federals have their ready made excuses, deflections, etc.

Remember that all elections in the US are STATE ELECTIONS. The federal government does not run (at least night yet) any election. It is a state function. It is the states that must decide who can or can not be on the ballot. It is states that should be held accountable. How many secretary of states or state Democratic leaders would have signed off on the Obama/Biden ticket had they known that Hawaii - at a state level - did not even declare its own (supposedly) native son eligible. Brian Schatz avoided lying in print in Hawaii by not doing so. He made Ms. Pelosi do it. So how many states who require candidates to be vetted did any vetting? No many. They took the Democratic National Parties members word and signed their names to the documents, their trusting nature and the history of the US to believe someones word was leveraged. Our trusting nature was leveraged and used against us. Not to unlike it was 10 years ago.


71 posted on 09/05/2011 7:25:06 AM PDT by bluecat6 ( "A non-denial denial. They doubt our heritage, but they don't say the story is not accurate.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

To: STARWISE

http://www.abdulhassanforpresident.com/

HIS WEBSITE


74 posted on 09/05/2011 6:44:24 PM PDT by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson