To: rintense
Oh, did you ask them if that’s why they’re standing there? Yes, that's my "ability." ;->
Seriously, they were no sustained applause, cheering, and chanting.
A bit dis-gusted (lack of wind in the sails) and apprehensive, I would say.
994 posted on
09/03/2011 12:48:27 PM PDT by
unspun
(It's the Sovereignty, Stu... | We are Gulag Bound)
To: unspun; rintense
Seriously, they were no sustained applause, cheering, and chanting. A bit dis-gusted (lack of wind in the sails) and apprehensive, I would say.
And yet a major part of the crowd hung around for 45+ minutes for the meet-n-greet to talk to her, to get her signature.
Me thinks your analysis is wee bit wrong.
Furthermore, name one other candidate or potential candidate that has the response I mentioned?
Perry? Ha!
Bachmann? She got 60-80 people at her last Tea-Party appearance.
Myth? Double Ha!
Cain? Not even close.
Nice try though at trying to spin the response as negative.
To: unspun
Wow, you’re really grasping out straws. She was interrupted at least twice with chants of ‘RUN SARAH RUN’, or were you on a potty break then?
1,033 posted on
09/03/2011 1:03:23 PM PDT by
rintense
(Polls are for strippers and cross country skiing. ~ Sarah Palin, 9.3.11)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson