I have considered that or a flat rate for all types of taxes, but I didn't think anyone had the balls to think about not taxing the producers
All the talking heads tomorrow, all the wonks on Fox Business, CNBC, ll the financial media and all the Wall St donors and all the businesses in America have just been handed down the gauntlet, you will be able to produce again when we get rid of this little turd squating @ 1600 Penn..
This is not going to go un-noticed....
As a I asked a college bud and close friend that became a high-tech tycoon years ago, do you consider giving to charity? His response. "150 people employed that I responsible for and the all the ****ing taxes I pay aren't enough?"
She gets my buddy's response...
I have considered that or a flat rate for all types of taxes, but I didn’t think anyone had the balls to think about not taxing the producers
“All the talking heads tomorrow, all the wonks on Fox Business, CNBC, ll the financial media and all the Wall St donors and all the businesses in America have just been handed down the gauntlet, you will be able to produce again when we get rid of this little turd squating @ 1600 Penn..
This is not going to go un-noticed....”
Wooooo Hoooooo! Takes all the wind out of Obama’s sails for his stupid clueless speech. You cannot beat palin’s strategy for improving the economy.
Actually, not taxing corporate income is a basic plank of a pro-growth, pro-free-market economic program. And a lot of corporations will love the tradeoff between income taxes and tax breaks.
After all, who needs a tax break if you don’t pay taxes? The only companies that will be mad are those who can’t survive on their own and were losing money and only around because they got tax welfare.
It will be interesting to see whether we get more out of corporate income tax, or pay more out in tax breaks and corporate tax welfare.