[expat1000]

“The piece in American Thinker seems to debunk the pro-islamist claims. Am I missing something? Is there a credible refutation of the poits found in the article?”

Links here. I haven’t read them, and am not following this debate. Anyone wants to flame me for responding to your question - fine - waste your time if you want.

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/09/intellectual-dishonesty-of-the-perry-posse.html

[Vevey]

Thank you for your reply and the link. As for curriculum,there is nothing indicating whether the “Lesson Plan” as posted by Stein is being used in lieu of the curriculum liked by Geller. Unless we hear from someone involved in the classroom, there is no way to know what is taught. I find disturbing the curricula linked by Gellar. However, using the curricula to label Perry pro-Islamist suggests an anti-Perry bias. I know not if Perry is aware of the curricula linked by Geller nor if Perry responded to the curricula by having the lesson plan posted by Stein implemented. At the end of the day, it doesn't really matter because Perry is the most electable “conservative” candidate. Those truly concerned about Islamic tendencies would be well advised to stay out of the weeds and focus on the real peril, the re-election of the most anti-Israel pro-Muslim president. This nation is in peril. Sometimes the “perfect” must be sacrificed on the alter of the “better.” If one sees no difference between Perry and Barry, then my argument is pointless.