Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Flag_This

The founders NEVER intended that the SC would be the sole arbiters of what is, or is not, constitutional! In fact, the envisioned that court as being a rather academic endeavor!


144 posted on 09/03/2011 7:20:10 AM PDT by Bigun ("The most fearsome words in the English language are I'm from the government and I'm here to help!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: Bigun
The founders NEVER intended that the SC would be the sole arbiters of what is, or is not, constitutional!

Conservatives need to use proper language when talking about the court. We're not waiting for the court to determine whether Obamacare is constitutional, or "make" it unconstitutional. We're waiting for it to recognize that it is unconstitutional and was from the moment of inception. The Court has no authority to grant legitimacy to unconstitutional legislation. Since the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, any Court action which is contrary to the Constitution is illegitimate.

153 posted on 09/07/2011 4:22:29 PM PDT by supercat (Barry Soetoro == Bravo Sierra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson