Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: riverdawg

P. U. LBJ won because the electorate was not going to change horses again after the assassination of JFK and yes, I’m old enough to remember the election, too.

Obama is a Marxist, but our side has to put up a moderate to attract the middle? Sheesh.


76 posted on 09/02/2011 7:43:25 AM PDT by onyx (If you enjoy FR, support it! If you support Sarah Palin & want on her Busy Ping List, let me know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]


To: onyx
Just Sayin' $1,000 to Sarah Pac the instant she announces!
89 posted on 09/02/2011 7:55:15 AM PDT by Utah Binger (Southern Utah where Freepers will meet again next summer. Especially Elsie!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

To: onyx

It wasn’t simply that LBJ won, but Congress (both the Senate and the House) emerged from the 1964 election with 2/3 Democrat majorities, enough in the Senate at that time to override any Republican filibuster. I don’t think either party has had that large a majority since then.


98 posted on 09/02/2011 8:04:14 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson