To: jennychase; svcw; Responsibility2nd; Rapscallion; GeronL
WOO-HOO!
THIS MEANS OVER 26% WANT HER TO RUN SO THAT PUTS HER RIGHT IN THE LEAD WITH THE SO CALLED FRONT RUNNERS!
LOLOLOLOL.
LET'S HEAR IT FOR IDIOT POLLS!
15 posted on
09/02/2011 7:04:23 AM PDT by
onyx
(If you enjoy FR, support it! If you support Sarah Palin & want on her Busy Ping List, let me know.)
To: onyx
Right.
Now let’s see the respondents’ opinions about the other candidates’ running.
23 posted on
09/02/2011 7:18:16 AM PDT by
ScottinVA
(With "successes" like the Libya adventure, who needs failure?)
To: onyx
She’s not my preferred and I want her to run simply to improve our chances against the RINO brigade.
26 posted on
09/02/2011 7:18:46 AM PDT by
cripplecreek
(A vote for Amnesty is a vote for a Permenant Democrat majority. ..Choose well.)
To: onyx
Yep pretty much corporate media has started their social conditioning.
44 posted on
09/02/2011 7:29:12 AM PDT by
Tempest
(Google: Rick perry bi-national healthcare)
To: onyx
Yep pretty much corporate media has started their social conditioning.
47 posted on
09/02/2011 7:29:37 AM PDT by
Tempest
(Google: Rick perry bi-national healthcare)
To: onyx
ding~! ding~! ding~! we have a winner
When Romney had 26% support among republicans they said he was “the front runner” (I kept pointing out that 74% were AGAINST him)
63 posted on
09/02/2011 7:35:47 AM PDT by
Mr. K
To: onyx
My question is: How is it that she stays in third place in most polls, behind Perry and Romney and ahead of M. Bachman and she has not even announced yet?
109 posted on
09/02/2011 8:20:44 AM PDT by
WVNan
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson