Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Oceander
If punctuated equilibrium supposedly accounts for ending of the pre-Cambrian stasis, and that the Cambrian explosion occurred in a very short [geological] time frame, how do you explain a half billion years of (for all intents and purposes) a post-Cambrian stasis?
56 posted on 08/31/2011 9:32:15 PM PDT by mtg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: mtg

You, like the other troglodytes, don’t read too well, do you. The emphasis in “punctuated equilibrium” is on the “equilibrium” part, not on the punctuation. The theory aims at an explanation for why there should be equilibrium at all, given that the prevailing view at the time was so-called gradualism, in which evolutionary changes slowly accumulate, one by one, over time, and in which no species ever rests at an equilibrium point where it is not accumulating changes that will eventually lead to another species. In other words, Eldredge and Gould took aim at, and shot down, the then-prevailing theory with a theory that was more consistent with the facts.


77 posted on 08/31/2011 9:59:29 PM PDT by Oceander (The phrase "good enough for government work" is not meant as a compliment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson