I don’t see why there was any doubt about this.
Some people claim Perry’s endorsement of Rudy in ‘08 called into doubt his pro-life reputation.
You know, we’ve seen that bandied about here, along with other unwarranted assumptions that Perry must’ve agreed with Rudy on everything where they actually differ.
Otherwise, I can’t see where it would’ve ever been in doubt.
Perry explained that Rudy would’ve appointed conservative judges but otherwise not involved himself in the issue.
Now, Perry is affirming that his VP choice would be unequivocally pro-life.