Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ConservativeDude

>> But logically, those are the only two possibilities......

Isn’t there a third possibility? Doesn’t she earn her living as a commentator/pundit? And isn’t one of her interests to advance conservative politics in general?

She might be going to where the action is simply to *further her own interests*, even if those interests don’t involve running for POTUS this cycle. She, like everyone, is endowed by our Creator with the freedom to pursue happiness, no?


98 posted on 08/31/2011 8:40:02 AM PDT by Nervous Tick (Trust in God, but row away from the rocks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Nervous Tick

Doesn’t she earn her living as a commentator/pundit? And isn’t one of her interests to advance conservative politics in general?”

I would say no to both of those. The main game in town now is to oust obama. The survival of the Republic depends on it.

There comes a point when you have to get with that program in one way or another, ie, by backing a candidate, or by becoming a candidate. This is FAR TOO important to mess around with.

If she has chosen the commentator pundit route, that’s fine, good with her. But she has a moral obligation at this stage to be clear about that and she should not draw any attention to herself as a potential candidate. For her to know that she is not running, but to behave this way (Iowa followed by NH) would be morally inexcusable.

Like I said, I have no earthly idea what she is going to do. But if she doesn’t run, shame on her.


121 posted on 08/31/2011 8:46:38 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson