Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Cincinatus' Wife.
"Forcing pregnant women to receive medical treatment from less-skilled providers certainly seems to be at odds with 'protecting the physical and psychological health and well-being of pregnant women,' one of the Act's stated purposes."
HTF would that be a possible result? I guess this is another continuation of the myth of the back-alley abortion.


11 posted on 08/31/2011 3:24:39 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: SunkenCiv

Yes! Will someone tell me why it is logical to assume that “less-skilled providers will be willing to meet the “onerous” requirements that more-skilled providers won’t?


20 posted on 08/31/2011 6:23:16 AM PDT by hocndoc (http://WingRight.org I've got a mustard seed and I'm not afraid to use it.https://www.rickperry.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson