Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservaliberty
Tacticalogic, I am getting the impression that you dissapprove of pornagraphy, but are against outlawing it. Is this correct?

I disapprove of what would probably be universally considered pornography, and I enjoy some of what more strident people would consider qualifies as pornography, but it's not something I actively pursue.

I'm for local communities being able to control it within their jurisdictions. I'm dead set against any notion of the federal government doing it, absent a constitutional amendment that explicitly enumerates that power and defines it's scope and limits.

If you wanted an absolute YES/NO answer, I don't have one for you.

102 posted on 08/30/2011 7:43:48 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic

No, that’s okay. Sometimes questions don’t have yes/no answers to them, especially when they have multiple parts (as mine did).

“I enjoy some of what more strident people would consider qualifies as pornography, but it’s not something I actively pursue.”

Not sure why, but the above sentence made me chuckle.

So, I know we are discussing the legislation of pornagraphy in general. If I understand correctly, you say that federal government should have no jurisdiction over it. Now I wonder, what about child pornagraphy? Do you think that it is reasonable for the federal government to make it illegal?


113 posted on 08/30/2011 8:12:31 PM PDT by Conservaliberty (Ancient Chinese Curse: "May you live in interesting times....and may you always get what you want.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson