Posted on 08/30/2011 3:00:44 PM PDT by topher
Do you support the War on Drugs?
Why should I answer any question you pose? You’ve ignored the substance of most everything I’ve had to say to you.
In fact, we’re done.
See ya.
That's right in line with his more recent statement: As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc.
You don't know what conservative means, and you sure don't represent conservatism with your liberaltarian extremism.
That's right in line with his more recent statement: As a conservative site, Free Republic is pro-God, pro-life, pro-family, pro-Constitution, pro-Bill of Rights, pro-gun, pro-limited government, pro-private property rights, pro-limited taxes, pro-capitalism, pro-national defense, pro-freedom, and-pro America. We oppose all forms of liberalism, socialism, fascism, pacifism, totalitarianism, anarchism, government enforced atheism, abortionism, feminism, homosexualism, racism, wacko environmentalism, judicial activism, etc.
I have no problem with anything mentioned in this statement. Most things mentioned in it are obviously state issues. I suppose you disagree with that and think the federal government has the right to do whatever it wants, assuming it fits within your moral purview.
There's nothing extreme about wanting the federal government to limit itself to its constitutional functions, like national defense, border security, and the judiciary, with a few other minor activities.
Do you think that the federal government has the power to wage a War on Drugs? If so, from where in the Constitution does it obtain this authority?
Mommy should have kept her knees together. I don’t need a sermon from a professional “victim”
Yup. Blame shifting......
It's as old as the Garden. Adam even tried blaming God.
But there is another form of abuse to consider:
The abuse that pornography can do to a child.
A child exposed to the images/scenes in pornography can be corrupted and defiled by pornography.
In other words, I believe pornography can corrupt a child.
And if the child was also sexually abused, then perhaps that is a form of double abuse.
Psychology is not my strong suite...
Adam’s response.....
Genesis 3:12 The man said, “The woman whom you gave to be with me,......”
Our Pastor pointed out that nothing happened until ADAM ate the fruit. He was the "head", the leader. Eve didn't exist whem Adam was given dominion over everything. Adam was the original "The buck stops here" guy.
Adam is going for a twofer blame; both God and the woman.
I guess he figured had all the bases covered with that one; if God didn’t accept the blame of one, He might with the other.
Yep. And Adam lost the world’s very first blame game.
*
Exposing a child to pornography has terrible effects and is nothing less than child abuse. That’s why sex ed is so horrible, it’s just state mandated porn and child abuse.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.