Yes, you did get what you want. You got a man who is the offspring of a foreigner. You are arguing that the right of foreigners—even America’s most virulent enemies—to father our presidents is what the NBC requirement is there to protect. Otherwise, it would exclude them by limiting that one office to the children of American citizens.
You’ve turned very nasty today. Change your tone; there is no justification for it. I posit that it is absurd on its face that the Founders put in the NBC requirement to protect King George’s right to father a future POTUS. You defend that position. When I point that out, you attack me. That is truly nasty and repugnant behavior; knock it off.
you're the one who called it "soft of mind" and "bleeding heart," when speaking of the provision, not me.
You should understand the difference between supporting a law, and living with the unfortunate consequences of extreme situations under the law. I am arguing for what the Founders set forth, no more, no less. You think you can do better - great, go and try. But if you can't discuss that without making wild accusations, you're not fit to debate.