Chuck, you are a liar. Taquyya is not an ‘Idea I dreamed up’ in my head, it is a tenet of Islam and you only look like a fool denying it. Since you respond to these posts, you apparently can read, just not comprehend. Read the Koran until you understand it.
You cannot oppose Sharia Law and be OK with Islam as a religion as it is “Inseparable” from Islam.
When you get an American to agree with you, let me know.
The part you made up was about my words suggesting any support of appeasement. You just made up a fake opponent with ideas you can denounce. You made two false claims in this post; I didn’t claim Taquyya was an idea you dreamed up, nor did I deny it. Again, you deflect rather than discuss, and posture to an audience that doesn’t exist rather than try to seriously discuss an issue.
You CAN oppose Sharia law and still support the 1st amendment protection against interference with religion.
Your argument presumes that we can effectively remove Islam from the list of recognized religions. You are free to believe Islam isn’t a religion. I’m not going to even try to argue the point, because it’s a moot point. Islam is RECOGNIZED as a religion, and until you can point to a SINGLE politician who supports changing that, all of your protestations to the contrary make no difference whatsoever. Again, we are talking about choosing a presidential candidate — which one agrees with you?
So, to make this perfectly clear, just in case someone gets confused by your lying about my position: I oppose Islam — both the political and religious aspects. It’s a false religion, one that we pray each week in church that people will be saved from. I don’t think Taquyya is made up, that’s just a false claim. I don’t deny it, because I didn’t speak about it at all, which was another false claim.
I have no interest in reading the Koran, which is a false book of a false religion.
Most Americans, at least most conservatives, understand why the 1st amendment exists, and why we need to keep the government out of the religion-picking business, even though that means false religions abound. It is tempting to some people to look to the federal government to implent our personal beliefs, especially when a religion is so clearly bad as Islam is, and the 1st amendment protects us from that evil temptation which would otherwise consume our country.
But obviously you can’t argue against the 1st amendment. I think that’s why you claim I said things I didn’t, to set up a straw man you CAN argue with. As if you were trying to win a debating point with a non-existant audience, rather than discuss an issue.