False premise Chuck. We are talking about YOUR appeasement.
As for RP, that’s the whole point of Vetting him. So we KNOW where he stands. Just like Palin, just like Bachmann, Cain and the rest. Or do you have a problem with full disclosure from our candidates? How about a problem vetting them?
As soon as the candidates address the issue publicly, we won’t know the answer to your second question, now will we?
Now how DO YOU get around that Taquyya thing chuck?
Actually, you are talking about some false idea you've dreamed up in your head, based on no evidence, and hoping that if you repeat it enough, someone might stupidly believe you instead of what they actually read.
I think freepers are smarter than that.
It is clear we have a few freepers posting in this thread who have no respect for the freedom of religion enshrined by our founding fathers in the 1st amendment.
I proudly stand by the 1st amendment, even though it means we have to put up with abhorent religious beliefs.
We also have to strongly oppose sharia law. That job will only be made harder by those few who equate that fight with the banning of the religion of Islam. But if you are so certain of your position, advocate for a constitutional amendment that removes 1st amendment protection for islam. WHen you get an elected politician to agree with you, let me know.