Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RED SOUTH
Perry polled around 10% everytime he was polled in the mix of candidates until after hew officially got in the race.

Another Red South talking point, and just as wrong as all of the others. First, Perry was polling between 10 and 18 points before getting into the race (check RCP). Second, Perry did not have almost 100% name recognition, nor had he been campaigning almost non-stop since 2008. That honor goes to Sarah of the 10%...

19 posted on 08/29/2011 2:39:09 PM PDT by CA Conservative (Texan by birth, Californian by circumstance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: CA Conservative

And the fact is, you’re only telling half the story. The other half is, with all that name recognition goes high national negative ratings. High negatives with low name recognition is not easy to overcome. High negatives with high name recognition is worse. It means most people have already made up their minds.

How does that play out in the primary, where her negatives will be obviously much, much lower than in the general election?

I’ll tell you how. They will lead to this question in the minds of many who love and adore Sarah: Is she the right candidate to put up against the Magic Negro?

That’s how. And that’s why she might continue to poll below Perry even if she declares her candidacy.

And knowing that (smart person that she is) might be the reason you don’t see her running right now at all.


27 posted on 08/29/2011 2:47:09 PM PDT by samtheman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson