So Thomas gets the Commerce Clause right, yet you support fedgov when it tramples the original meaning.
1. Is that a principled support of the Constitution?
2. Are there any other sections of the Constitution that you would trample, or just the Commerce Clause and Tenth Amendment?
I think it is very principled. I don't consider protecting the majority from the minority as a trampling of the Constitution. In this specific instance, I see it as insuring the general welfare of the People.
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Hey, Ken. I'm more than happy to have this back and forth with you, but, if you're going to start throwing accusations and attack me with logical fallacy, then I'm outt'a here. So, let's keep it friendly and enjoy it.