There is no moral equivalency between providing equal protection for the God-given, unalienable right to life, as all of the Constitution’s stated principles, and its explicit, imperative words, require, and the misuse of the commerce clause.
The natural law premises laid out in our national charter, the Declaration of Independence, are organic to everything else about our constitutions, our laws, and our form of government. You can no more remove them than you can make water not be wet.
>There is no moral equivalency between providing equal protection for the God-given, unalienable right to life, as all of the Constitution’s stated principles, and its explicit, imperative words, require, and the misuse of the commerce clause.
I did not say there was; what I said was that it could be used for ill purposes.
>The natural law premises laid out in our national charter, the Declaration of Independence, are organic to everything else about our constitutions, our laws, and our form of government. You can no more remove them than you can make water not be wet.
No; but consider this, what you propose would make what God did, in the person of Jesus Christ, illegal.
After all, Jesus IS God and by His own will went to the cross as a man.
Now, answer me this: what sort of person would claim that the nation’s founding character was Christian in nature and yet make illegal the very thing upon which Christianity is founded illegal?