Posted on 08/29/2011 10:45:33 AM PDT by neverdem
God, issue a warning when you post that photo.........that there is a face that could stop clocks!
“Why this disparate treatment of looks in so many areas of life? Its a matter of simple prejudice. Most of us, regardless of our professed attitudes, prefer as customers to buy from better-looking salespeople, as jurors to listen to better-looking attorneys, as voters to be led by better-looking politicians, as students to learn from better-looking professors”
It’s not prejudice, then, is it? Obviously on the level of the customers a case can be made, though it’s not fair to say out of hand that this is any more of a prejudice than our prejudice for, say, food that tastes good. We could perhaps eat nothing but sufficiently nutritious gruel and live long lives. But we are willing to pay for yumminess, just as we are willing to pay for attractiveness in the buying experience.
I digress. The main point is that even if the disperate treatement derives from prejudice on the part of customers it is most assuredly not a matter of simple prejudice. It is a matter of supreme justice, custmore preferences being what they are.
This is also why she will win in a landslide.
“Guys like Napolean and Audy Murphy learn to adapt and compensate.”
In Napoleon’s case it wasn’t so debilitating as the myth around him has built it up to be. He wasn’t that short, for his time. It’s true, however, that his stature was a liability. More of a liability, I’d say, was his being a dirty Corsican. Both were diluted by his living in the aftermath of ‘89, which portended much for military organization.
That being said, imagine he had been 6’3’’. Maybe his men would’ve Valley Forged it in Russia.
Very well put.
More than that, it causes severe disruptions in the time-space continuum. Can you imagine being the White House Press Secretary for a GOP President and seeing that 'thing' sitting in the front row with the automatic 1st question 'right' when she was working for her former employers? How many Tums and how many bottles of Malox?
I always say, “Cash is king, but beauty’s queen.”
They say Attila was very short, too. And James Madison.
OF COURSE some people are more beautiful than others!
Even God acknowledges this! The bible has multiple references towards beauty, and how this distinction is a physical truism.
If physical ugliness attracted the eye, media executives would not hire women who look like this:
They would hire women instead who looked like this:
If we don't have beauty, then God has given us other gifts which we are to find and use. God sees the heart of every person. That is what is important. But, only PC leftists would try and make a "civil rights" case out of physical ugliness.
I suppose that in these evil days, where colleges are now giving scholarships to homosexual perverts based on their disgusting behavior (does a "Fister" get more money than others?) - then nothing should surprise us.
I feel like I’ve just been run over by a bus.
I remember watching some TV show some years back, that did situational studies with ugly women and attractive women.
One situation was a flat tire along a highway. Within seconds of the attractive woman exiting the car three cars had already stopped to help fix the flat. When the fat ugly woman did it, she had to jack up the car and fix the flat herself while cars were just whizzing by.
So what. Missing the point entirely.
No, I don’t recall. Meanwhile, what in God’s name is your point?
Not every short man is a tyrant like Napolean. I was beaten and abused by a man who was 6 ft. 4 in. to my 5 ft. 98 lb. frame.
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
A man who has green money stuff in his hand is much more attractive to females than otherwise (not that green is forever, but some worship it that way and our current crisis is betting on that worship).
A man who is happy with a girlfriend will also look a lot better and women/business will be after him.
It’s all in the energy.
It’s a petty point, but then it’s a petty subject.
I was saddened reading that. I hope you took that as the opportunity to get an equalizer.
This is true right down to voting. Ever since women got the vote, the prettier guy with the fuller head of hair has had an instant advantage over his uglier opponent. The taller guy already had a big advantage over his shorter opponent with the male vote.
It is a real and indisputable fact that good looks confer a massive advantage on a person, all things being equal. This has always been true and always will be true. Human nature never changes.
Don’t forget Mickey Rooney, and Alan Ladd. I remember hearing that he would have to stand on a platform to appear taller than some of his co-stars in close up scenes.
I survived it (sadly, I still occasionally have very bad nightmares). Good news is I met and married a beautiful man who loves me, loves God, loves my kid as his own AND even gets along better with my mom than I do (ha ha). We just celebrated 22 years in May : )
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.