Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mazda77
It is definitely not a '62. The molding on the car in question is too low. '62 had it up by the greenhouse.

It is definitely a '64 after looking at some pictures. '63 had louvers at the back near the tail lights. '64 didn't.

1965 was the big square redesign.

29 posted on 08/28/2011 1:03:56 PM PDT by Lazlo in PA (Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: Lazlo in PA
1965 was the big square redesign

Yes, and they a) cut 500 lb. out of the car and b) added a lot of sound insulation to quiet the car down. Remember how they advertised that the interior of a Galaxie 500/XL in motion at 50 mph was quieter than a Rolls?

They also changed the engine lineup. I mentioned the 289 -- that was not available until '65, my mistake. In 1964 the base engine was the four-year-old 260, delivered in the early 64-1/2 Mustangs. (My dad test-drove a 1960 Ford station wagon equipped with a 3-in-the-tree and a 260. Not impressed! 'Course, he was used to our '57 Country Sedan with its "Thunder Road" 312 Police Interceptor that generated 265 BHP at 6000 RPM when equipped with a Rochester 4V carb ....)

47 posted on 08/29/2011 3:19:27 AM PDT by lentulusgracchus (Concealed carry is a pro-life position.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson