Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wonder Warthog

Extracting oil from shale is fairly costly from what I’ve read.
I’d bet on oil sands being much cheaper.

In any case, I think Keystone got US government endorsement yesterday.


21 posted on 08/27/2011 6:41:24 AM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks (I want a Triple A president for our Triple A country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Eric in the Ozarks
"Extracting oil from shale is fairly costly from what I’ve read. I’d bet on oil sands being much cheaper."

Well, actually, my comparison was intended to be between oil sands and coal, but oil shale might not be that far off.

I recall reading somewhere some time back an article that Shell had come up with a process for "in-situ" pre-processing. As I recall, they basically drill two wells, run a cable down each, and then impose an electric current, heating the rock, and lowering the oil's viscosity.

Once "thinned" by heat,the oil is then able to flow to a horizontally drilled production well located between the "electrode wells".

22 posted on 08/27/2011 6:51:21 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson