“People aren’t born smokers or drinkers. They’re almost certainly born gay. So your analogy doesn’t work (IMO).”
You are totally wrong on this, you should research more.
The same type of changes in genes that predispose someone to being gay exist for drinking and smoking.
If you genetically test people for being gay, you find heterosexuals that have been normally married for 40 years.
This is a Fact.
How do you genetically test someone for being gay?
You are totally wrong on this, you should research more.
The same type of changes in genes that predispose someone to being gay exist for drinking and smoking.
If you genetically test people for being gay, you find heterosexuals that have been normally married for 40 years.’]
Except, if you were born in a country that had no alcohol (say Am. Indians before Europeans) or a land w/ no tobacco (say Europeans before Am. Indians) that would never come out.
But a genetic inclination to homosexuality always will, because there are always going to be men and women. Also, I think you can make an argument that a relationship w/ a partner is part of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”. It's so basic to human existence, not like smoking or drinking.
That said, I said “(IMO)”, because I realize others disagree. So that's it, we just disagree.