homosexual researchers aren’t really looking for a gay gene, it doesn’t help them ... they are looking for the prefect set of genetic and other conditions that perfectly explain homosexuality as a borne trait and not one chosen .. they won’t claim success unless they have a very high correlation.
You setup unrealistic hurdles to convince yourself that you are right and to keep any doubt from entering your brain
You never bother to ask what is their motivation, what are all the for and against reasons there would be for finding a gay gene? What is their agenda?
What they found in 2005 was in fact a gay gene, the fact that it wasn’t 100% perfectly matched to homosexuals caused the gene to be discredited because if it really was a gay gene, in their mind it would have 100% correlation to homosexuals. This is a problem for them. It didn’t jive with their preconceived notions just like yours. You are looking for black and white when there is gray ... the same as these researchers.
Not everyone with the smoking gene smokes...same with this
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biology_and_sexual_orientation
None so blind as he who does not wish to see. That includes people who cling to falsehoods.
I will not bother reading/responding to anything else you post, you have not even read the link I posted previously. You want to cling to crap, your choice. I’m too busy to waste my time with blind fools.