>>Ron Paul is an Anti-semitic NUT<<
Wow! How could I possibly argue with your logic? You so eloquently and completely described why Ron Paul is an anti-semitic nut, I would be a fool not to believe you.
BTW, exactly why is Ron Paul anti-semitic? I am Jewish, and I don’t think he has an anti-semitic bone in his body. In fact, his ideology is strongly influenced by Murray Rothbard and Ludwig von Mises, both Jews. How can one be both anti-semitic and an admirer of Jews at the same time?
Maybe Ron Paul does not like the actions of SOME Jews. I love my Jewish parents and siblings, but I personally hate the actions of the ACLU, founded by Jews. I hate all loud-mouth Jews, like Chuck Schumer and Jon Stewart. I hate all dishonest Jews, such as the majority of Wall Street executives. And I truly hate the Jews that run the major media outlets and Hollywood — the ones who have corrupted our culture. But I also hate the Gentiles who did the same. So maybe I just hate evil and love liberty. Ron Paul hates evil and loves liberty, so I believe he is a pretty good fellow.
Ron Paul is a strict constructionist (an ideology foreign to all liberals and nearly all so-called conservatives). Keep that in mind the next time you spout your venom.
It is my understanding that Ron Paul opposes foreign aid on constitutional grounds. In 1791, the President, George Washington; the Vice President, John Adams; and the Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson, all approved an act of appropriations by Congress to pay tribute to Morocco.
From the perspective of the Constitution, there is no substantive difference between tribute and aid since neither is addressed.
If Ron Paul is a strict constructionist, then how does he explain Congress' action here, and his own interpretation of the Constitution regarding foreign aid.
So when Ron Paul doesn’t get the nomination, who you gonna vote for?