Posted on 08/25/2011 12:43:08 PM PDT by Sarabaracuda
The 6 of them were more of the thinking that Congress ie the R’s have not helped Obama. This “balance” word flew around alot. Balance is a stupid word all it means is both sides lose. Ive gotten to where I cant listen to stupid any longer....lol
Watch out...you’ll be added to her watchlist.
That's why I've maintained, and will still maintain that Obama is going to be extremely difficult to beat, regardless of which GOPer goes forward. Poll after poll shows Americans still... after some 945 days into Obama's administration.. blame Bush for the weak economy. And it's the economy upon which they'll base their vote next year. Obama doesn't have to actually find solutions to problems; he only needs to appear to be "trying" to do so.
One dynamic at work that many of us overlook, is though people disapprove of the job Obama is doing, voters still like him personally. There's something about his countenance they simply find appealing.
I still believe it's going to take not only a superb selling job by the GOP nominee, but a major -- and timely -- scandal to bring Obama down enough to be defeated in 2012. Otherwise, the economy is the "it" thing, and voters still seem reticent to give the Republicans another go in the White House.
” ... how can ALL of the Republican candidates be losing to Obama, when at the end of the survey he still loses to the generic Republican?”
I think that most Independents want someone besides Obama, so generic Republican does well. But, when you start putting names to Republican, then the negatives come along with each candidate, and those Independents choose Obama over the candidates the GOP is offering.
Rasmussen is a bullfeathers poll.There is no way obama would be ahead of mickeyfrickinmouse much less any republican challenger.
It isn’t just these people. Look at the polls. Obama is near even with republicans. I don’t understand why anyone would want him re-elected.
Historically, Rasmussen has been the best...
The fact that many people don’t know who Perry is, yet he is polling this well is telling. OTOH everyone knows who SP is and she keeps getting beat handily in these polls. I think SP would be the better president, but it’s getting harder to see her winning the election.
Difficult, but not impossible. The nominee will have to have:
1. Reasonably benign negatives
2. A record of job creation
3. Presidential appearance and charisma
4. Not afraid to attack Obama’s record
Perry comes closest to those requirements.
Gallup had Perry tied. He can pull off a strong win, IMHO.
Did they all look like good little Nazi’s?
Someone please explain something to me.
If Hussein in Rasmussen’s poll is tanking, how can he be handily winning against these Republicans?
Are these the same people or different ones?
Makes no sense.
Look, I don’t care if you hate Romney or not...any one of the Republicans would move the nation more to the right than Hussein. Maybe not as much as we’d like, but certainly not shooting down the sewer like Hussein is doing.
The polling is helpful only in determining how unpopular Obama is right now. He is the only one listed who is clearly a known personality, and he is only getting 43% of the vote. Pollsters always claim that that is an unwinnable situation for an incumbant. This poll shows that 57% do not want Obama to have a second term.
FDR came up with the New Deal ponzi scheme that is the genesis of the massive welfare schemes at the root of our Federal debt problem and various other big government schemes that prolonged the Great Depression. He won 4 presidential elections. As George Bernard Shaw put it - "A government which robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul".
To someone who’s been in the race a week, pulling 43 percent against them, and 43 against pretty much every republican.
With adults? Not good.
But he’s still not dead in the water.
I’m wearing my flame retardant suit for this question, but can someone please give me the rationale for pushing for Palin when Bachmann is already in the race? What makes Palin a better candidate?
I don’t believe Americans saw Roosevelt as putting forth a ponzi scene. I believe they saw him as someone who was doing something to bring America back from the brink of destruction. You can argue all you want whether his policies prolonged the depression but millions of Americans believed they were necessary and people were working again. Obama has done nothing that has put people back to work.
If someone asked if you had a good marriage and would be still married in 15 months and you where undecided, what is the likely hood that you would be married in fifteen months? Not likely!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.