To: GreaterSwiss
They said they had a sign posted “No Camera’s allowed for security reasons”. I don’t know if this is legitimate or not. Apparently it is enforceable. This is becoming a Police state.
14 posted on
08/24/2011 7:03:36 PM PDT by
CometBaby
(You can twist perceptions .. reality won't budge!)
To: CometBaby
If Chabot's people paid to rent the hall he can exercise controls like that.
Your demand for something different would entail a violation of his 4th amendment rights.
19 posted on
08/24/2011 7:17:11 PM PDT by
muawiyah
To: CometBaby
“No Camera’s allowed for security reasons”. I don’t know if this is legitimate or not. Apparently it is enforceable. This is becoming a Police state Yes and you couple that with the fact that the State is increasing IT'S use of surveillance cameras everywhere.
To: CometBaby
They said they had a sign posted “No Camera’s allowed for security reasons”. All the while HAVING cameras for security reasons.
Bunch of GD traitors if you ask me.
30 posted on
08/24/2011 7:33:41 PM PDT by
unixfox
(Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
To: CometBaby
Security reasons ... Yeah. Job security for Chabot.
64 posted on
08/24/2011 8:30:34 PM PDT by
Steel Wolf
("Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master." - Gaius Sallustius Crispus)
To: CometBaby
They said they had a sign posted “No Camera’s allowed for security reasons”.I seriously doubt the sign had an apostrophe in the word "cameras."
To: CometBaby
Apparently it is enforceable. This is becoming a Police state.
And yet nobody seems to care about the bans on cameras at PGA events..........Selective indignation I guess.
116 posted on
08/25/2011 1:36:07 PM PDT by
Hot Tabasco
(FREE YOUR BREASTS! FREE YOUR MIND!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson