I think I was the first guy to notice that the pukes claiming to be upset about the video cameras at the "meeting" in Ohio were probably not our folks.
I'm going to analyze the thread and see if I can cross correlate it with other Leftwingtard stuff ~ maybe we can identify another Soros or Holder "truth squad" puke or two.
Now, regarding your boy in Texas ~ it's OK to defend him but it's wrong to question the motives of those of us who find him too soft on illegal aliens to be trusted.
It ain't that way elsewhere ~ maybe in Texas where you got to live with them cheek by jowel, but not here ~ and the last thing we want to see happen is for you to give them a college education so they can move out here and unfairly compete with our kids for the better jobs. They can go back home to Mexico and compete there. We can't!
Thanks for the clarification. However, you would do well to follow the links to an objective evaluation of Perry’s positions and the most common complaints against him. On the instate tuition thing he required that all illegals who had been in Texas for at least three years and who had graduated from a Texas high school could get instate tuition IF they applied for citizenship. That application would then be processed as are all others.
That is not amnesty and that does not guarantee citizenship. It does, however, smoke some of the illegals out of the underbrush. Is that bad?
With a degree they could be more productive citizens if they become one. If they did not graduate from college or a trade school or whatever, they would still be better qualified, if they were sent back to Mexico, to be productive there. He is not giving them a free ride. They must still pay tuition and with a degree they are less likely to ever be on the dole if they become citizens through the approved process.
I am not sure I like it but it does have some plusses.
Again, you should follow this link and get more insight into the issues about Perry.
http://peskytruth.wordpress.com/2011/07/19/rick-perrys-negatives/