Actually I think a better comparison can be made with government employees. Tea party members are political activists, not a social/occupational group. Like government employees today, kulaks were vilified simply on the basis of their occupation, not for their political activism. They lived their lives in good faith and were castigated for political purposes. I’m not saying that there aren’t abuses and waste in the public sector, or that all public sector workers are blameless, but the broad brush attacks on civil servants remind me of the outlandish charges leveled against the kulaks during the period of collectivism.
They were not vilified on the basis of their occupation. They were vilified on the basis of belonging to a particular socio-economic class. They were vilified as exploiters of the peasant class. It was their relationship to another class that was exploited.
Furthermore, government employees are not demonized by the government, as the kulaks were. That is a huge difference. It's odd that you've overlooked it. Perhaps you got lost on your way to the DUmpster?
My county government in washington only hires leftist environmentalist.
I refuse county personnel access to my property which they believe belongs to them.
A few years ago the county created a secret list of land owners. A revenge list or a $hix list.
This was discovered via foia.
Tell me how wrong I am again.
Of course, a good socialist/communist is compelled to say that. Never mind that the comparison is absurd, one being a producer, the other a parasite.
I'll let others sort out which is which.
The poor abused pigs, the "more equal" animals deserve the better status, wealth, perks and position they enjoy so much so, that they can spend hundreds of millions$ to maintain their priviledged position.
The working taxpayer, the horse, better not complain, cuz their perfect paradise depends on him.