Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

And There's Your Perfectly Leaked Explanation: CME Hikes Gold Margins, Again, This Time By 27%
Zero Hedge ^ | 8/24/11 | Tyler Durden

Posted on 08/24/2011 2:10:06 PM PDT by Nachum

Two weeks after the CME hiked gold margins by 22%, and two days after the Shanghai Gold Exchange sent them higher by 26%, here comes the CME, as we expected, with another 26% gold margin hike (previously: "Should we expect 3 more SGE margin hikes in the next 2 weeks? Or will the CME rightfully accept the baton and do everything in its power to dent the parabolic rise in the alternative reserve currency? We are cautiously looking at what the CME will do today and will advise readers."). And now we know that this particular margin hike was leaked well in advance, and explains the entire $100 plunge in gold today. And as a reminder, the August 1 CME margin hike worked... for about 30 minutes.

(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: explanation; gold; leaked; perfectly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
And here is the reason why Gold dropped by $80 yesterday. It was an attempt by the market to control the cost so the suckers would get scared and the big players could buy more at an artificially lower price.

Wonder what their profit will be when it bounces back? Playing all the suckers...

1 posted on 08/24/2011 2:10:11 PM PDT by Nachum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Nachum
GOLD FALLS TO EARTH, STOCKS RALLY AGAIN: Here's What You Need To Know
2 posted on 08/24/2011 2:14:00 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
$9,450 initial margin to control $190,000 worth (100 ounces) of gold. That's 20 to 1 leverage, about what it is in other commodities. Funny thing about this sleazebag Tyler Durden is that he never talks about initial margin reductions, which occur when gold prices and price volatility fall:

Exchange operator CME Group Inc. (CME) cut the amount of collateral required to trade gold futures in a move that may invite greater speculation in gold. As of close of business Monday, speculators in the benchmark gold contract must put up an initial margin of $6,075 per contract, down from $6,751. To keep the contract overnight, these traders must maintain $4,500 of the initial margin, down from $5,001.

CME also lowered the initial and maintenance margin requirements for hedgers and exchange members, to $4,500 from $5,001 previously.

When price movement becomes less volatile, margins typically go down because the risk of the position also decreases. This is the case with the decrease in gold margin requirements yesterday, CME said. The lower margins therefore, are a boon for gold speculators, who can buy or sell more contracts with less cash starting next week.

In truth, the exchange raises margin requirements to guard against losses, because it has to make up the difference when speculators can't cover their losses and go bust. Margin requirements go up (and down) for the same reason that home purchase down payments go up (and down) when home prices go up (and down). Durden's profound dishonesty is one of the reasons his website is pretty worthless as a source of investment information.
3 posted on 08/24/2011 2:33:05 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Anyone dealing in gold futures instead of the real stuff is an idiot.
4 posted on 08/24/2011 2:52:54 PM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Well said. Thanks.


5 posted on 08/24/2011 2:56:29 PM PDT by e_castillo (Drill here drill now...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Danger: The QE 3 “Hope” Rally Is Going To End TERRIBLY
6 posted on 08/24/2011 2:56:37 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: blam

Atta way blam, continue to post your historically wrong propaganda.

I don’t know what your motivation is but I do know your preoccupation with “The Business Insider” and their constant bearish outlook on precious metals and their incessant bullish outlook on the stock market is bu!!shit.

If I’d have listened to you and your beloved “Business Insider” I’d be $20,000 poorer right now.

You actually make Cramer look good.


7 posted on 08/24/2011 3:16:09 PM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

bttt


8 posted on 08/24/2011 3:20:24 PM PDT by petercooper (2012 - Purge more RINO's.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
Anyone dealing in gold futures instead of the real stuff is an idiot.

A speculator who puts up $9450 initial margin makes $9450 with a 5% increase in the gold price. That is why speculators use gold futures - 20 to 1 (or more) leverage. By comparison, someone who buys the "real stuff" only makes $472.50 from a 5% increase in the gold price. The reason initial margins go up? If a gold futures contract goes down 10% in a day ($18,900), and that speculator cannot put up additional margin, the futures exchange has eat the $9450 loss, which has to be paid out to a speculator who is shorting gold. Note that any increase in initial margins applies to both the long and the short side - both buyers and sellers of gold futures have to put up more up-front money to make their bets. This means it is more expensive to go long, but it is similarly more expensive to go short, something that Durden leaves out in his misleading screed about the CME attempting to drive gold prices lower.

9 posted on 08/24/2011 3:36:50 PM PDT by Zhang Fei (Let us pray that peace be now restored to the world and that God will preserve it always.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

Duh, if the world went to hell, you will not be able to trade that piece of paper for an old can of beans.


10 posted on 08/24/2011 3:54:52 PM PDT by org.whodat (What does the Republican party stand for////??? absolutely nothing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Nachum

It probably will bounce back and in short order, but gold is such a treacherous market right now I wouldn’t touch it.

Actually a lot of the market is like that what with all the game-playing and insider trading going on. Joe Sixpack plays in this casino’s rigged games at his peril.


11 posted on 08/24/2011 3:55:53 PM PDT by icanhasbailout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Pretty much.


12 posted on 08/24/2011 4:07:43 PM PDT by savedbygrace (But God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Berosus; bigheadfred; Bockscar; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; ...

Thanks Zhang Fei:
In truth, the exchange raises margin requirements to guard against losses, because it has to make up the difference when speculators can't cover their losses and go bust.
/bingo


13 posted on 08/24/2011 4:07:49 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (It's never a bad time to FReep this link -- https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

>> “Duh, if the world went to hell, you will not be able to trade that piece of paper for an old can of beans.” <<

.
And is true of all paper.


14 posted on 08/24/2011 4:25:10 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Sarah Palin - 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
"Playing all the suckers... "

The only suckers are the one's who are buying this bubble.

15 posted on 08/24/2011 4:36:20 PM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
As long as the fiscal situation here in the US and frankly just about every other economy is in dumps, gold has a long way to go to be in a bubble and yes I do believe we will get a mania stage like we saw in the tech stocks or in housing but we are far from it. Also, if by some miraculous circumstance and the politicians actual start to care about their countries, morals, real values, and just all round decency then yes you could say where in a bubble at that point. However I believe the chances of this happening is about as good as a snow ball lasting in hell.
16 posted on 08/24/2011 4:58:22 PM PDT by DarkWaters ("Deception is a state of mind --- and the mind of the state" --- James Jesus Angleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Nachum
Don't care what happens (wrt price) as long as the price-per-oz doesn't fall to around $260-$280.

OTOH, confiscation???

17 posted on 08/24/2011 5:14:43 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zhang Fei

I can understand why businesses might want to buy or sell futures to ensure a certain price - Kellogs might want to be able to lock in the corn price for example. An airline might want to lock in fuel prices for a couple years, etc.

But a lot of money looking for a return, large investment firms and hedge funds can move the price of commodities in a big way, up or down, without any actual interest or use of the product in question. Not persuaded that is necessarily a good thing.

And as far as housing goes, it seems obvious now that it was a bad thing. “Easy money” - low interest loans, (Zirp), coupled with no lending oversight plus insane leverage created a huge real estate bubble, and destroyed the investment banking balance sheet, and has called into question the basis of private property ownership (MERS) since the prommissory note and deed have been separated, etc. It just goes on and on... The fraud and corruption is almost beyond description. And if that isn’t bad enough, it’s all been transferred to the public balance sheet.

So you’re saying that downpayment req’s are going up based upon whether real estate values are going up? Not that long ago, downpayments were essentially zero, while RE prices were going up. Now, they are apparently going up, while RE is going down.

Hm.


18 posted on 08/24/2011 7:33:48 PM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
"If I’d have listened to you and your beloved “Business Insider” I’d be $20,000 poorer right now."

I have never given investment advice on Free Republic.

I'm a retired chip-maker, I have nothing to do with anyone in any other business, especially investing.

If you don't like BI, quit reading it...(And, stop whining.)

19 posted on 08/24/2011 9:49:23 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: blam

I didn’t say you “gave investment advice” I said you post self serving propaganda that is wrong.


20 posted on 08/25/2011 4:33:39 AM PDT by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson