This is interesting, but to be fair I really don’t take the National Enquirer seriously.
National Enquirer has actually been pretty accurate. They are the ones that busted John Edwards.
They were accurate on many demowit scandals in the past and they are FOB.
Remember The National Enquirer broke the Lewinsky story and the Edwards baby/daddy story.
“... ut to be fair I really don’t take the National Enquirer seriously.”
You should, they are far more of what news papers used to be than the main stream newspapers like the NY Times and Washington Post. And they have broken several major stories before anyone in the MSM have even been interested.
When it comes to aliens, horoscopes and Jeanne Dixon predictions, I would agree. However, the Enquirer has a pretty solid record recently with regard to hard news. When it involves real people, they can't just make stuff up out of thin air. They are subject to libel laws just like everybody else and have had to pay out big $$$ in the past, so they are pretty careful about these things.
Neither did John Edwards.
I believe the NE broke the Monica Lewinsky scandal after the entire MSM suppressed it for months.
>>This is interesting, but to be fair I really don’t take the National Enquirer seriously.<<
Neither did John Edwards. But he learned quickly.
But that’s where you’re making a mistake! Remember, the NE broke the story on Edwards. Owned by Clinton buddies!
Neither did Gary Hart or John Edwards.
Perhaps you would reconsider given that they have an ARMY of liability lawyers and fact checkers to keep from being sued and they've been a well known CIA storefront since the 1970's
.............. Yeah, they've never broken a story the mainstream media hasn't thoroughly hidden. Let's ask the silk pony and father of the year John Edwards , Jesse Jackson's bastard kids, Rangals tax accountant, John Kennedys flight instructor, Patrick Kennedys rehab sponsor and on and on.
they have a funny way of just coming up with interesting tid bits mixed in with bearded babies, aliens, fad diets and bikini pictures. Hahahahahahahaha
While I sort of agree, the NE did break the John Edwards scandal as I recall.
“This is interesting, but to be fair I really don’t take the National Enquirer seriously.”
Yeah, I understand they are questionable, but aren’t they the ones who brought out the blue dress during Bill Clinton’s “I did not have sex with that woman” years?
Sometimes the facts crop up in the oddest of places. It’s good that someone is exposing this type of thing regardless of their credibility. It brings these things out in the light so more credible sources can (if they so choose to) look into it and see if what the facts prove.
neither did John Edwards.