Posted on 08/23/2011 4:02:14 PM PDT by AAABEST
On this point she has been crystal clear.
Then I guess she’s not as smart as I gave her credit for.
I really don’t care what you think because you’re insignificant. Others may want info (Most of which comes from Perry’s own Governor’s website) Its for the benefit of people who want to do their own research and not take things for granted.
The fact is that Perry is making a serious mistake in running a liberal style campaign. It may play well with the casual news viewers but conservatives are far more aware than you give us credit for.
So for the record which polling company DO you believe?
cripplecreek is from the "If you don't think like me you aren't a conservative" school of semi-thought.
What was the point you were trying to make about Wind Energy? I don’t get it.
PerryForPOTUS Herman P. Vasquez
I prayed that my people would be saved, and Rick Perry answered.
20 Aug
https://twitter.com/#!/PerryForPOTUS
Maybe someone else who took the time to read it can tell me what I evidently missed.
Anyone?
“as people discover his warts and weigh out the trade offs.”
Nobody has as many racist, goosestepping warts as the 50 IQ pig obuma.
“as people discover his warts and weigh out the trade offs.”
Nobody has as many racist, goosestepping warts as the 50 IQ pig obuma.
*****
I know, right now, “W. is the only one who can win.”
Where have I heard that before?
*****
Umm ... in 2000 and 2004 ?
When George W. Bush actually DID win ?
-George
Everybody is a liar or a liberal if they don’t support St Rick.”
Probably because some folks are tired of being accused of being liars or liberals if they DO support “St. Rick”.
For example, I don't support Palin running, because I don't think she did the hard work to build up her resume over the last two and a half years, and I think her poll numbers are too low to be a credible threat to the President. What I don't say is she is a “RINO” because she happened to endorse John McCain.
When folks call Perry a RINO, they are in a sense saying his supporters are too...in other words, liars or liberals (what a RINO is, after all, by literal definition).
I suspect some folks here kinda got tired of that, and are fighting back.
And Conservative Principles lost. This country went further down the road to socialism under the Republicans during 2001-2006.
Calif Conservative wrote:
Umm ... in 2000 and 2004 ?
When George W. Bush actually DID win ?
Conservatives were told, "this is the best you can do." We held our noses and voted for the RINO/Progressive wing of the Republican party and we got:
Republicans (the "ruling class" Republicans) are responsible for a large part of the mess we are in. The Obama/Reid/Pelosi socialists wouldn't have won in 2006 and 2008 if Ruling Class Republicans had not abandoned their (aleged) conservative principles under George W. Bush.
That's all water under the bridge right now. Let's talk about defeating Obama and the socialists. To do that, we need a candidate that can actually win. Obama's top two choices (people he thinks he can beat) are:
I'm not convinced that Rick W. Perry can get past that in 2012.
This poll from PPP (People Pushing Perry?) doesn't convince me either. This polling group is not known for accuracy. They are known for pushing far left candidates and inflating their numbers. I seem to remember that the Daily Kos has commissioned polls from these people in the past, and blasted out the results as though they meant something. It's interesting that the PerryBots are doing the same thing now.
I don’t need any lectures from newbtard trolls.
Listening to people tell me I need to vote for a RINO like Perry one last time is like listening to an alcoholic promise to quit drinking after this last drink.
Those phoney hispanic republicans will help Perry topple Obama. He’s played his cards like a poker player and it will reap dividends. I know that makes me sound like a RINO doesn’t it? I’m not. I’ve sat back and watched Perry weave a nice little web that’s going to take in a bunch of hispanic support ALONG WITH RUBIO when he’s announced as Perry’s VP selection. I don’t normally forecast the future but I hope this is his choice.
Well NOOB, if the shoe fits...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2767681/posts?page=50#50
Love Rubio and hope one day he’s sitting in the Oval Office, but think ‘12 is too soon for him as VP on any ticket. A year ago he was a state legislator in FL. Now we want him “a heartbeat away” from the most powerful office in the world?
Have we learned nothing from watching what happened when the Dems foisted an ‘historic’ but utterly inexperienced candidate on us? There’s a good bench for the eventual GOP presidential candidate to pick his/her running mate from (at the moment I favor Santorum), but we should let Rubio get some seasoning before pushing him into a position he will be but is not yet ready to assume.
Fortunately, we haven’t had a VP step into the presidency in nearly 40 years, but the office exists solely to allow an instantaneous transfer of presidential power. It’s not a training ground for the office. We DO have to look at the VP candidates as potential POTUS from Day One.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.