You will be best served if you read Jim Robinson’s comments on this thread, not mine. He’s not all that fond of Perry either, so don’t expect a lot of us to rally around GWBII. We’You will be best served if you read Jim Robinson’s comments on this thread, not mine. He’s not all that fond of Perry either, so don’t expect a lot of us to rally around GWBII. We’re TEA PARTY CONSERVATIVES.
I also think you have a skewed interpretation of trolling. The poster SPAM trolled in post #3. and was called out for it by me first, and then the Boss, Jim Robinson.
If you want to respond, send a private message so as not to disrupt this thread any further
I think her announcement will be something of a "shock and awe" event that will seek to dispel right out of the gate many of the MSM/Dem/RINO mischaracterizations about her. I do not think this will look like any of the traditional "roll out". I look forward to the affirmative announcement.
“You will be best served if you read Jim Robinsons comments on this thread, not mine. Hes not all that fond of Perry either, so dont expect a lot of us to rally around GWBII.”
Good morning, onyx. I see your info thread was up for about a minute before a troll began to try to hijack it with an “invitation” to support Rick Perry. This happens routinely on Palin discussion threads, but I suppose they are ramping up their efforts as D-Day approaches in the next few days or weeks.
Jim Robinson delivered a series of replies to the troll’s request for “surrender” that would have made General Anthony MacAuliffe (who delivered the famous “nuts” reply to the German request for surrender at Bastogne) proud. It certainly made me proud. Jim says more in fewer words than anyone since Abe Lincoln. And he and Rush have about the same record for accuracy...99.44%. I can set my watch by those two..and Mark Levin.